As I Please

For a variety of reasons my previous blog was substantially reduced in size.

Following a civilised discussion with my editor it was agreed that whilst he had sound reasons for abbreviating the draft submitted to him (Ed – because large chunks of it had been in the previous blog verbatim) an appendix would be added to Holdenforth to restore some of the omitted material.

One reason for the confusion – I challenge HF readers to write a coherent blog in the current national and international climate- an unseemly blend of chaos, corruption and mendacity.

Let’s see how we get on this time.

Slaughter in Gaza

Where does Holdenforth  stand on the most worrying issue of today – the conflict between Israel and Palestine – or, or many refer to it- the conflict between Israel and Hamas.

The media – official and social – are replete with details of the atrocities committed by Hamas terrorists in Israel.

For its part Israel has vowed to inflict retribution on those responsible.

“A STORY has no beginning or end; arbitrarily one chooses that moment of experience from which to look back or from which to look ahead”

From “The End of the Affair”  by Graham Greene

In the beginning

In Year 2 of the first world war – 1915 – Lloyd George, in his capacity as Minister of Munitions, was concerned about the acute shortage of explosives.

He contacted Professor Weizmann, an accomplished chemist, to explain the problem to him and to seek his help. Professor Weizmann  quickly  solved the problem and his achievement  was a most important contribution to the British war effort.

Lloyd George asked him how he, Lloyd George, might reward Weizmann for his work.

To quote Lloyd George – “Weizmann  explained his aspirations as to the repatriation  of the Jews to the sacred land they had made famous. When I became Prime Minister – in December, 1916, I talked the matter over with Mr Balfour – the outcome was the famous Balfour declaration in 1917.”

This declaration read:-

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

During the next  28 years the collective mind of the Jewish Diaspora was understandably pre-occupied with the murderous activities of Hitler in pursuit of his final solution of the Jewish problem.

“In Palestine there was irreconcilable conflict between Arabs and  Jews.”

English History 1914 to 1945 —– AJP Taylor

“The Balfour Declaration was abandoned after 20 years of attempting to reconcile the irreconcilable. It was no doubt unreasonable that the Arabs of Palestine should pay the whole price of what was a world problem, anti Semitism. On the other hand British Governments had made repeated promises to the Jews”

Extract from English History -AJP Taylor

In our time there is no shortage of extremely effective propaganda machines.

To illustrate the point the Israelis rightly and raucously highlight that Hamas is a terrorist organisation but they are quite reticent on the terrorist organisation that brought Israel to power, namely Irgun.

Other critics of Israel point out that the Balfour /Lloyd George declaration in 1917 was conceding land that was not theirs to dispose of. That consideration would not have weighed heavily with Lloyd George.

The Years 1945 to 1948 in Palestine

In post war Palestine the British Government attempted to maintain peace between Jewish immigrants and existing Palestinian communities.    This was not an easy task and the UK sought to relinquish the mandate.

One feature of this phase was the emergence of Irgun, a Zionist  group roughly equivalent to Hamas in Gaza today.

In the years from the end of WW2 to 1948 Irgun proved to be masters in using terror to secure their aims. Given the scale and severity of the terror the British Government of Mr Atlee wished to be relieved of the mandate.

The Irgun Group wrote the text book for terrorism that has been imitated around the world to this day.

It is ironic that the “terror”  tactics employed by Hamas are taken out of the Irgun textbook.

One terrorist activity of Irgun was to place a bomb in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in the summer of 1946.This hotel housed the British Secretariat and Army HQ and almost 100 people were killed.

The public comments of senior British politicians about this appalling act of terrorism could serve as a template for the terms used to describe  Hamas today.

The universal hostile references in the UK – including the comments of the then Prime Minister, Mr Attlee, – to the terrorist activities of Irgun -can be accessed on the internet.

The State of Israel was established in the summer of 1948.

Events in Palestine since 1948  have seen years of the steady expansion of Israel at the expense of Palestine and others.

Israel continues to occupy and even extend illegal settlements, a point noted in the last 48 hours by Mr Gutierrez, the Secretary General of the UN despite the opposition of the United Nations.

“All the devouring and insatiate Monsters imagined since imagination could record itself are fused in the one realisation, Guillotine. And yet there is not in France, with its rich variety of soil and climate, a blade, a leaf, a root, a sprig, a pepper corn which will grow to maturity under conditions more certain than those that have produced this horror. Crush humanity out of shape once more and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again and it will surely the same fruit according to its kind.”

From “ A Tale of Two Cities” by Charles Dickens

In the above extract Dickens was making the simple point that the horrors of the French Revolution arose from the suppression of the people by the ruling class in previous years.

Thus – The French Revolution

Thus the emergence of Hamas

As I write possibly the most harrowing event now taking place anywhere in the world is the treatment by Israel of the 2 million inhabitants of Gaza, a tiny narrow strip of land – approximately 45 square kms to the south and west of Israel.

It is in this tiny area that Hamas operates and in which the October 7 attack was planned

In the 12 or so weeks that have elapsed since October 7 Israeli forces have inflicted huge casualties on the civilian population.

“Political language has to consist of euphemism, question begging and sheer cloudy  vagueness. Defenceless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets; this is called pacification. Millions of peasants are robbed of their farms and sent trudging along the roads with no more than they can carry: this is called transfer of population or rectification of frontiers… “

From his essay -Politics and the English language –1946

HF considers that these words of Orwell accurately describe the current situation in Gaza.

Where does Holdenforth stand on the vexed question of illegal immigration?

* Many of the asylum seekers and refugees are simply seeking to do what you and I would do were we in their shoes – to improve the conditions of their lives.

* It could be argued – indeed it is argued by some – that the criminal gangs arranging illegal entry in small boats are simply exploiting a clear gap in the travel market – to provide a travel service to those seeking a better life.

* The UK authorities encourage the growth of this market opportunity by making available to those who succeed in landing on our  shores a significantly more agreeable life style.

*  Most of the venom of those in the Tory party anxious to demonstrate that they have a workable plan to tackle the problem is directed against small boats with their cargo of illegals.

* As I write there are around 2 million Palestinian civilians in Gaza being subjected to the sort of treatment and worse as described by  Orwell in the previous paragraph. Sooner or later someone will suggest that arrangements be made to allow these genuine asylum seekers and refugees to come to the UK possibly in very large boats – say a couple of Royal Caribbean  Cruise liners with each with capacities of at least 5000 thus getting around  the ban on small boats – what happens then?

Which of us would not gladly exchange life  in Gaza for a new life in the UK?

What about Brexit? .

The Brexit debate rumbles on. Very few now seek to argue that the UK should rejoin the EU.

The Labour MP for Torfaen -and the MP for Holdenforth –  Nick Thomas-Simmonds , has been handed the most formidable challenge of all in the Starmer shadow cabinet, that of reaching new arrangements with the EU short of full membership.

Mr Thomas – Simmonds has our full support in this Herculean assignment.

For all practical purposes – the UK is out of and will remain out of the EU for the next few years.

For HF that leaves a little unfinished business. Prior to the referendum in 2016 we had a modest wager with a rambling colleague about the outcome. We hoped fervently for a remain outlook – but we lost our preference and our wager. We hope to settle up before the Grim Reaper calls. 

Finally – a few HF slogans from previous blogs- slogans dear to our hearts and a few new issues that we will return to in future blogs.

Whither the BBC –  We will continue to campaign for the privatisation of the BBC.

We demand to know what is holding up the appearance in court of those responsible for the appalling miscarriage of justice in the persecution of sub postmasters.

Full credit to The Daily Mail for its vigorous campaign

HF is, if nothing else, a kindly blogger. We would be quite happy for The Rev Vennells to take her  CBE with her into Holloware were she to be convicted by a jury of her peers of criminal conduct.

While we are on the subject – we beg  HMG to abandon the languid Chilcot approach to interminably protracted public enquiries so beloved by senile judges and rapacious lawyers. We will open the bidding at a maximum duration of 3 months on any public enquiry.

When will the issue of who can work from home and in what circumstances be decided by management rather than by those languishing in the comfort of their own homes.

Let us widen this point – when will the management sector of our society be persuaded to do the job which it is paid to do. The public is constantly  assured that this is the reason  for the substantial reward packages paid to those in the sector.

Players and managers. HF was not surprised at the early departure from the management scene of Mr Rooney.

“Rooney on the scrap heap”

Daily Mail Jan 3 “

The Daily Mail piece noted the absurdity of the argument that the very best players in soccer are well placed to move into managerial positions.

The job of the manager/coach  is very different from that of the player.

How many more players will be quickly humiliated when they “move into management” before this obvious outcome is appreciated.

The Mones V HMG

“WE have been hung out to dry on PPE, the Mones moan”

Daily Mail Jan 2

Holdenforth noted that The Mones were fighting back after the initial setback of Lady Mone admitted telling porkies to an interviewer.  As one might expect the facts as opposed to the gossip are not easy to come by but the gist of the defence now being put forward by “lying Baroness Bra” (soubriquet courtesy of doughty Mail reporter Guy Adams) and her husband Mr Barrowman is that they followed the rules laid down by HMG at all times.

More to the point – this issue will not be on the Pandemic enquiry for over a year.

HF thinks that the Mones have a point.

Dead Souls

“How ghost patients have boosted GP coffers by £955m”

Daily Mail- Jan 2

“ GP surgeries are being paid millions of pounds a year for patients who do not exist, figures show”

Nice work if you can get it ,.

Even better if you can get it for not working.

The business model for this imaginative venture was described by Nicolai Gogol in his novel “Dead Souls” published almost 200 years ago in Russia. The hero of the novel, Tchitckoff, bought the souls of serfs who had died between one census and the next. He used these dead souls as raise cash.

There have been one or two changes in the past 200 years but you can see the similarities.

A word about Mark Almond, the  crusading campaigning columnist – and the director of the Oxford Crisis Research Institute.

“Make no mistake, this escalating crisis in the Red Sea could prove to be America’s Suez”

Mark Almond, Daily Mail, Jan 2

Mr Almond details the substantial hazard that has been added to the problems faced by the West in The Ukraine and in Gaza, namely the problem of keeping the Suez Canal open for business as usual. After reading his column it is not easy to think that 2024 will bring about any easing of international tension.   

Charity queen with a colourful life dies aged 61

The charity queen in question was Camila Batmanghelidjh who rose to national prominence some 20 years ago. The charity she founded and helped to manage was Kids’ Company.

The charity raised huge sums of money to provide support for young people suffering from abuse, poverty and trauma, all worthy causes. However unkind critics of the charity felt that Camila was enjoying an expensive lifestyle funded by the charity although a  lengthy and costly High Court case exonerated her of mismanaging the charity or its funds.

The lesson here – it is not easy for charity commissioners to ensure that monies raised for charity always find their way to the intended recipients.

Finally – a memory test.

HF vaguely recalls that Kate Bingham was thought to have done a good job during the CV pandemic whilst Dido Harding was deemed to have turned in a shaky performance – or is it the other way round.

So – Holdenforth memo to Lady Hallett – chair of the pandemic enquiry – get a move on – we demand to see your report by the end of March, 2024 – repeat end of March, 2024. 

Labour Party Prospects and the Middle East Conflict

In our previous blog we pointed out some discrepancies between the performance of the Sunak administration and the claims made by Mr Sunak at his party conference.

We pointed out what we thought were significant gaps between claims and performance.

The voters in the bye elections in Mid Beds and Tamworth seemed to share our view. Both formerly rock solid Tory seats were lost to the Labour Party.

The antics of Crispin Blunt have hammered another nail into the Tory coffin.

These losses cannot have strengthened the position of Mr Sunak as he seeks to persuade various countries in the Middle East to maintain support for Israel.

Holdenforth had planned, in the interests of fairness, to carry out a similar check on the Labour Party as it prepares for the next general election.

This has turned out to be a difficult assignment.

Why so?

It appears to us that the key core central policy of the Labour Party in the current political climate is to obtain the keys of No 10 – all other considerations have been jettisoned to secure this objective.

The approach of the Labour Party appears to have been based on the tactics used by the boxer, Mohamed Ali – “I will float like a butterfly and sting like a bee”.

This approach will be greatly assisted by the fact that its Tory opponent is already on the canvas and out for the count.

Are there any weaknesses in the Starmer policy?

A few. Here goes.

The unanimity across the UK in support of Israel is starting to fray at the edges as Palestinian voices within the Labour Party appear to be growing louder. My guess is that Starmer will argue that this is a tribute to the diverse spread of opinion in the UK, a state of affairs long championed by the Labour Party.

In some areas of the UK – notably in the devolved parts – policies are being introduced which have not been welcomed even in the devolved areas. In my devolved area, Wales, one policy has been met with a mixture of derision and disobedience – that of the 20mph speed limit. Holdenforth aka John Holden is quite relaxed on this issue. The only journey currently in our plans is from home to the local crematorium – we are sure that the hearse driver will be happy to comply with the 20 mph limit.

In some Labour controlled local authorities, those in charge tried to introduce a policy of allowing employees to work – a doubtfully accurate term in this context – a four-day week whilst retaining their five-day rewards packages. The Labour Party apparatchiks have nipped this loony left nonsense in the bud.

A spot of plagiarism. Eagle eyed readers have spotted a few infringements by Rachel Reeves of the time-honoured guidelines regarding plagiarism. Her apologists will plausibly argue that RR was in such a hurry to get so many things done in the twin causes of Starmerism and Feminism that one or two errors crept in. Holdenforth fully accepts that these errors fade into complete insignificance when contrasted with the lamentable failures of Mr Sunak and his administration.

Abuse of parliamentary privilege. Nigel Farage has rightly complained that Sir Chris Bryant lied in the Commons alleging under the protection of parliamentary privilege that he, Farage, had been paid by The Russians for services rendered.  Labour could be on shaky ground here. Holdenforth understands that Bryant has episodes on his CV would not look good when the inquisitive media trawl the files in search of material to dredge up. People in glass houses should not throw stones, especially when serving on committees set up to scrutinise standards in public life.

The transgender issue. Holdenforth understands that there are influential voices in the Labour Party that are raucous in support of those seeking to argue for choice in the delicate matter of gender. This contentious issue continues to feature in the media and the debate continues to generate more heat than light. The Holdenforth stance – based on a Keep it Simple approach – has been consistent from the outset: “If my aunt had bollocks, she would be my uncle but she doesn’t and she isn’t”. We suggest a quick and simple test to establish who is what – those with balls are male. What they would like to be is a different matter – most of us would like to have been dealt a better hand by mother nature but that is a different matter. We would also point out that a core tenet of American Foreign Policy is-”When you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow“ – but we are drifting from our theme.

Summary so far  – game, set and match to Starmer.

What are the silent majority thinking?

A persuasive voice has been heard lately suggesting that the two big parties ignore at their peril those who hold opinions out of step with the proclaimed views  of the big two.

They pose the question -What are the people REALLY thinking?

Matthew Goodwin has secured a platform to answer this question by the simple time-honoured technique of sampling. His findings might – just might – provide uncomfortable reading for the movers and shakers.

A number of issues have emerged under this heading.

They include:

  • Immigration
  • Gender
  • Care arrangements for the elderly
  • Net zero policies
  • Anti motorist policies

The silent majority are all too ready to answer questions on these matters. It could be that the perceived gap between leaders and led will attract the interest of embryo politicians who believe that they have identified a gap in the market for power.

There is still time for those avid for influence to seize the moment.

IF substantial numbers of voters dislike the polices of both parties, how can they express their views.

Watch this space.

So: might Starmer be in some difficulties as election day looms?

Senior managers employed by HMRC are said to be clear on the distinction between tax avoidance and tax evasion – and to be adept on cracking down on tax evasion.

Holdenforth suspects that the formidable Laura Kuensberg will pin down Starmer on the distinction between policy avoidance and policy evasion.

She will home in on Starmer should he attempt to duck and weave on policy evasion.

“It’s a perfectly straightforward question Sir Keir. Please give viewers a clear answer.”

How does Holdenforth intend to vote?

I will vote Labour. My local MP is a jewel in the rather battered crown of the UK Labour Party.

I give you – Nick Thomas Symonds.

Middle Eastern Matters

Where does Holdenforth stand on the most worrying issue of today – the conflict between Israel and Palestine – or, or many refer to it – the conflict between Israel and Hamas?

As I write the media – official and social – are replete with details of the atrocities committed by Hamas terrorists in Israel.

For its part Israel has vowed to inflict retribution on those responsible.

Holdenforth opted to glance back at the origins of the conflict.

The Balfour Declaration issued in November, 1917

In Year 2 of the first world war – 1915 – Lloyd George, in his capacity as Minister of Munitions, was concerned about the acute shortage of explosives.

He contacted Professor Weizmann, an accomplished chemist, to explain the problem to him and to seek his help. Professor Weizmann quickly solved the problem and his achievement  was a most important contribution to the British war effort.

Lloyd George asked him how he, Lloyd George, might reward Weizmann for his work.

To quote Lloyd George – “Weizmann explained his aspirations as to the repatriation of the Jews to the sacred land they had made famous. When I became Prime Minister – in December, 1916, I talked the matter over with Mr Balfour – the outcome was the famous Balfour declaration in 1917.”

This declaration read:-

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

During the next 28 years the collective mind of the Jewish Diaspora was understandably pre-occupied with the murderous activities of Hitler in pursuit of his final solution of the Jewish problem.

The Years 1945 to 1948 in Palestine

In post war Palestine the British Government attempted to maintain peace between Jewish immigrants and existing Palestinian communities. This was not an easy task and the UK sought to relinquish the mandate.

One feature of this phase was the emergence of Irgun, a Zionist group roughly equivalent to Hamas in Gaza today.

In the years from the end of WW2 to 1948 Irgun proved to be masters in using terror to secure their aims. Given the scale and severity of the terror the British Government of Mr Atlee wished to be relieved of the mandate.

The Irgun Group wrote the textbook for terrorism that has been imitated around the world to this day.

It is ironic that the “terror” tactics employed by Hamas are taken out of the Irgun textbook.

One terrorist activity of Irgun was to place a bomb in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in the summer of 1946.This hotel housed the British Secretariat and Army HQ and almost 100 people were killed.

The public comments of senior British politicians about this appalling act of terrorism could serve as a template for the terms used to describe Hamas today.

The universal hostile references in the UK – including the comments of the then Prime Minister, Mr Attlee, to the terrorist activities of Irgun can be accessed on the internet.

The State of Israel was established in the summer of 1948.

Post 1948

Events in Palestine since 1948 have seen years of the steady expansion of Israel at the expense of Palestine and others.

Israel continues to occupy and even extend illegal settlements, a point noted in the last 48 hours by Mr Guterres, the Secretary General of the UN despite the opposition of the United Nations.

All the devouring and insatiate Monsters imagined since imagination could record itself are fused in the one realisation, Guillotine. And yet there is not in France, with its rich variety of soil and climate, a blade, a leaf, a root, a sprig, a pepper corn which will grow to maturity under conditions more certain than those that have produced this horror. Crush humanity out of shape once more and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again and it will surely the same fruit according to its kind.
From A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens

In the above extract Dickens was making the simple point that the horrors of the French Revolution arose from the suppression of the people by the ruling class in previous years.

  • Thus the French Revolution
  • Thus the emergence of Hamas

The terms and conditions of the Balfour declaration have drifted a little down the years away from Palestinian claims and in favour of Jewish claims.

Lloyd George was rather too ready to cede land that was not the property of the UK to dispose of.

All Propaganda is Lies
George Orwell

Holdenforth goes along with Orwell on this view but it would be interesting to see the details of Palestinians killed as against the number of Israelis killed in the various conflicts in and around Israel since 1948.

Our suspicion is that fatalities on the Palestinian side significantly outnumber those on the Israeli side.

What might happen next?

It is now by now a commonplace of history that Bevin (Foreign Secretary in the Labour Government from 1945 to 1950), brought the State of Israel into being very much as Lord North and George the 3rd founded the United States.
From
The Power of Ideas by Isaiah Berlin.

Two shaky assertions from a normally calm and lucid eminent historian.

It is not easy to predict a civilised lasting settlement to this frightening conflict, the origins of which go back into the mists of time.

For our part we hope for the best but we fear the worst.

Notes by the Editor

While Holdenforth has sought to focus on the origins of the conflict (which others might argue dates back to 733BC when King Tiglath-Pileser III of Assyria turfed the Jews out of Samaria), Holdenforth’s editor would like to address two pertinent contemporary questions.

Firstly, why now? And secondly, what is Hamas’ endgame? It strikes me that an October 11 article by Joe Macaron neatly encapsulated the multiple answers to the first question, namely that, firstly, additional land-grabs by settlers in the West Bank, encouraged by Netanyahu’s far-right government; secondly, the recent normalisation of Arab-Israeli relationships, and in particular the détente between Tel Aviv and Riyadh; and, critically, greater warmth between Hamas and Iran. While the first point will be used by Hamas as justification for its action, the second and third points are perhaps more salient here. Given that Hamas’ raison d’etre is the annihilation of Israel (and, it can be argued given the wording of its founding charter, of all Jews), Middle Eastern stability involving that state is anathema.

This leads us to the answer to the second question. In performing the most devastating massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, Hamas would have clearly understood what the consequences would have been to Palestinians living in Gaza: its objective was to provoke a regional conflagration, destabilise the fragile tolerance between Israel and its neighbours (and, post-Netanyahu, scotch the potential of a viable two-state solution coming about) and, as a corollary, inflame intra-nation conflicts between Jews and Muslims elsewhere in the world. This much has been recognised by the Biden administration (and, it must be said, by several other Western governments including those of Germany and the UK), which have in public smothered Israel in love while privately seeking, somehow, to stop the dreadful situation spiralling out of control. Hence the measured calls for pauses in conflict rather than ceasefires, which Israel will (a) never agree to given that, they argue, it will provide an opportunity for Hamas to regroup and rearm and (b) may exacerbate a siege mentality and lead it to proceed with even more terrible effect, making that regional conflict far more likely. Let me repeat: no matter how many letters Miriam Margoyles and Michael Rosen sign, calling for a ceasefire, it will make not one positive contribution to the outcome, although it might give them a warm feeling inside.  

Meanwhile, we also have that third answer to Question One tied up in all this. Behind Hamas, Hezbollah and an assortment of other disparate Shia militant organisations lurks the Islamic Republic of Iran, providing them with funding of the order of $700 million per annum. While it was not behind the October 7 attacks (or even knew about their precise timing), then it certainly contributed to Hamas’ capabilities, both directly (it has transferred artillery rockets to Palestinian groups) and indirectly, via finances and expertise. Iran shares Hamas’ goal of destabilising Arab-Israeli relations, and Iran is more than happy to enable proxies to achieve that goal.

Like Holdenforth, we fear for the worst in this.